Have you updated your buzzwords?
You may think you're appropriately buzzword-compliant, but this is internet time, baby, and last month's 2.0 buzzwords are outdated (but not in that retro-cool way). If you're doing a VC pitch and building to flip, it's crucial that you sound as current as possible. Listen and learn:
Bonus points: mentioning "yellow fade" and "attenuation" in the same sentence could be worth an extra million. This month, anyway.
Grand prize: just as the hipster PDA made low-tech cool again, feigning ignorance of Web 2.x is the new black.
My take: Some of the coolest people have no frickin' clue what these buzzwords mean, and don't care. They aren't building to flip, they're building to engage and inspire.
That doesn't mean throwing the user-driven baby out with the Web 2.x bathwater--there's some really useful stuff in there (people genuinely LOVE FlickR and del.icio.us, for example). But these Web 2.x buzzwords are more technology and business-model focused than user focused, and that's a recipe for building things that meet the checklist but fail the users.
Where there is passion, there are users kicking ass. If we want to build Web 2.x and beyond, we should be thinking less about how to upgrade our technology, and more about how to help upgrade our users' brains, bodies, and spirits. Yes, I realize that many--even most--of the Web 2.x buzzwords can lead to meaningful (in some cases profound) benefits for the users. But the emphasis still feels technology-driven, not user-kicking-ass- driven.
Why not rewrite these buzzwords in terms of what they mean for users?
For example, we know that "harnessing collective intelligence" is good... but why? I don't necessarily want you "harnessing" my anything, unless... unless it means I benefit from the result. And of course, that's the point-- that end-users can benefit from all that group wisdom, like Amazon reviews or delicious/popular tags, to help reduce the flood of data. So why not say it like that? Instead of calling it "harnessing collective intelligence", why not call it "helping users make smarter choices, more quickly, by accessing the knowledge, experience, and wisdom of a larger group?" If the focus is on the "harnessing" and not on the "so users can access..." the chances of building something that nobody actually wants goes up. (Of course, my variation of the buzzword is awkward, ungainly, and not likely to look good on a slide. But I'm sure other more creative people can make them snappier : )
We know that Ajax is good, but why? If it's about richer user experiences, then say so. And why stop there? What's the benefit to the user of that richer experience? And is that always a benefit?
And what does the cloud do for users? What does attenuation do for me? If it's about helping users reduce stress, or spend more time in flow, or have more fun, etc.... whatever it is, why not say that?
A buzz-phrase should explictly state how it directly benefits the user.
If I were a VC, the "elevator pitch" I'd ask for would be simply: "Tell me how this thing helps the user kick ass?" If you can't answer that, don't bother launching your power point.
Posted by Kathy on December 4, 2005 | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Have you updated your buzzwords?:
» Web 2.0 y más allá from Tecnocitas
Si queremos construir la Web 2.x y más allá, deberíamos pensar menos en cómo mejorar nuestra tecnología, y más en cómo ayudar a mejorar los cerebros, cuerpos y espíritus de nuestros usuarios. Kathy Sierra (Creating Passionate Users) ... [Read More]
Tracked on Dec 4, 2005 4:01:30 PM
» Have You Updated Your Buzzwords Lately? from Strategy Central
Ever been in a world that has its own lingo? Ever been tempted to become buzzword fluent in order to schmooze your way into a connection or a sale? The blogosphere is totally that kind of world. In that world [Read More]
Tracked on Dec 4, 2005 9:57:06 PM
» Kathy Sierra On Clearing Up The Web 2.0 Buzz Words from Life On the Wicked Stage: Act 2
Kathy Sierra of Creating Passionate Users has a great post on updating and perhaps clarifying Web 2.0 buzzwords in todays' things are moving at the speed of lightening days. If you haven't updated your buzzword list from Web 2.0 to [Read More]
Tracked on Dec 5, 2005 4:31:24 AM
» Der Low Tech PDA from Kay's Blog
Den Hinweis auf den Low Tech PDA habe ich eigentlich in Kathy Sierras Blog gelesen, der Coautorin eines meiner Lieblingbücher "Head First Design Patterns". Im Artikel macht sie sich über die üermässige Verwendung aktueller Buzzwords lustig (Web 2.0, se... [Read More]
Tracked on Dec 5, 2005 1:13:04 PM
» Web 2.0 interface design checklist from hypocritical
Great minds think alike. And that's probably why there is someone else out there--right now--thinking about the same kinds of smart things that that wicked-intelligent Kathy Sierra is thinking. And writing things like "Have you updated your buzzwords... [Read More]
Tracked on Dec 5, 2005 6:13:33 PM
» Words, Buzzwords, Tags, and Buzztags from Resonance Partnership Blog
Have You Updated your Buzzwords? That is the question being asked by Kathy Sierra at Creating Passionate Users....one of the blogs I would absolutely want to have access to should I find myself on the proverbial desert Island. She says [Read More]
Tracked on Dec 6, 2005 9:01:49 PM
» The Ink-Shortage: Let's Do Our Part from XYZephyr
Contrarian Kathy Sierra has got me confused; am I still supposed to embrace simplicity in my designs or am I now to employ circumlocution? If her recent post on buzzword abhorrance is any indication, it is the later and it [Read More]
Tracked on Dec 9, 2005 7:22:14 PM
» Web 2.0 Buzzword fun from Web 2.0 is Web-Licious
In case youve been missing out on the right way to talk about Web 2.0, here is a helpful illustration: You should really check out the whole post on Creating Passionate Users and also brush up on your Web 2.01ß buzzwords. http://headrush... [Read More]
Tracked on Dec 10, 2005 12:41:10 AM
» Clearing my browser from JD on [TBD]
Clearing my browser: I haven't been writing much lately... more talking with friends at the shop, thinking, taking some decompression time... in the extended entry are a whole bunch of links I found of interest but for which I didn't have enough origin... [Read More]
Tracked on Dec 11, 2005 12:47:16 PM
» Grab bag: Web 2.0 from Marketing Roadmaps
As many of you know, I am confused about this Web 2.0 thing. I get that the Internet is evolving and social media have really changed the landscape, but do we really need a version number ? Here are some [Read More]
Tracked on Dec 27, 2005 5:28:17 PM
» Happy Birthday AJAX. from ReveNews - Scott Jangro
Tracked on Feb 24, 2006 10:28:44 AM
Interesting... I mused along similar lines a few days ago: http://turnipspatch.com/web-two-point-nought/
Posted by: Jon Leighton | Dec 4, 2005 4:12:54 PM
Posted by: Shaded | Dec 4, 2005 6:43:51 PM
Reminds me of the random buzzwords generator I made a while back (based on an email forward I recieved)
Posted by: benjymous | Dec 5, 2005 3:52:55 AM
Hmm.. I'm working towards a Virtualization Architecture Concept and yeah, I need some buzzwords.;)
Posted by: Tarry Singh | Dec 5, 2005 5:38:01 AM
That is the funniest thing I've read all week. You rock.
Posted by: Michael Martine | Dec 5, 2005 7:51:49 AM
For "Ajax" read "Frames".
Posted by: Chris McEvoy | Dec 5, 2005 1:46:49 PM
Who cares if a buzzword looks good on a slide if people aren't sure what the hell you're talking about? Give me one guy talking in language that I can understand with a whiteboard and some markers over some marketroid reading buzzwords from some crappy PowerPoint any day.
Posted by: Roy Jacobsen | Dec 6, 2005 9:08:21 AM
Buzzwords are only cool as long as not too many people know them. Now that you've published this, you've gone and ruined these. Now we'll have to start all over. Thanks a lot.
Posted by: Dennis McClain-Furmanski | Dec 9, 2005 4:33:49 PM
I've published my comments (longish) on Kathy's post here:
Posted by: Alex Bunardzic | Dec 10, 2005 7:18:14 PM
You're grasp on the concepts in the cartoons above is stunningly lucid --- and hilarious.
I see the high falutent buzzwords as Creator/Operator lingo that holds power like the esoteric language of physics.
And the softer, user-friendly phrases, as laymen explanations. That obviously are for the viewer and don't hold as much mysterious sound of excitation that is somewhat required to inspire financiers and creators.
Its like why the military lingo is strung with extremely long acronyms. Nobody wants to stand there and spout of unecessary explanations... theres nothing like frank lingo on another level. Or something.
Surely you had to put all of your thoughts into a context and you have done very well. Thank you for updating my buzzwords.
Posted by: Wo | Jan 23, 2006 5:59:54 PM
As an old-school developer, I have to laugh at a lot of the buzzwords. For a few reasons:
(A) a lot of the buzzword-tossing is an "I'm more geek than you" alpha-male p*ssing contest. It isn't really about building better apps or making users happier. It's either about (as you state) impressing the people with the VC money, or trying to get that hottie geek-girl to sleep with you. Which is fine, but I'm unimpressed.
(B) all this newfangled AJAX stuff is just solving the same problems we old fogies have been solving for decades now. How do you build *useful* apps (rather than just "cool" ones)? How do you deliver lots of information without overwhelming the user? How do you maintain data concurrency? How do you maintain semantic content as well as informational content (what it MEANS as well as what it IS)? None of this is new; it just has new buzzwords. For all the young hotshots out there that feel like they're cutting edge because they're up on Ruby on Rails, they should be humbled to remember that people were solving the same problem in *COBOL*, fergawdssake. It's just new buzzwords, not new problems.
and finally, the most important one of all for tech people to remember (and the most often overlooked):
(C) all of the most important and difficult problems are HUMAN problems, not technological problems. Sure, tagging information with metadata is great, but who's going to do it? Unless people take the time and effort to tag their info, how useful is a tag framework? How do you convince people that it's really worth the work? IS it really worth the work?
That's why all of the "Web 2.0" stuff leaves me very unimpressed. Nobody's working on solving the really HARD, really IMPORTANT problems (like how can we use computers and information networks to make our lives more productive and fun) and everyone's focusing on the trivial technical details (like which XML microdialect should we use to tag this content). People are definitely overlooking the forest for the trees.
Meet the new boss -- same as the old boss.
Posted by: Tom Canham | Oct 8, 2006 5:09:14 AM
The comments to this entry are closed.