« Moving up the wisdom hierarchy | Main | My passion is awesome, your passion is lame »
It's TV Turn Off Week--can you do it?

April 24-30 is the official TV Turn Off Week! I've been TV-free for more than six years, along with my co-authors Bert, Eric, and Beth, and none of us will ever go back.
Imagine what you might do with that time? It's usually a misperception that one is too tired to do anything but television, but many people have to lose electricity or have their TV break before they realize that. [Many researchers claim that people don't watch television because they're too tired to have sex, but rather become too tired to have sex because of television.]
For Turn Off Week, I don't think it's cheating too much if you, say, download a show from iTunes and watch it on your computer while you're waiting for something to render... ; )
Or, get your movie fix by going to a theater. It's a different thing (at least according to film critic Roger Ebert--not an expert on the brain!) who refers to it as something like, Television has a passive hypnotic effect, but watching a film at the theater is absorbing--you are completely engaged. But many of us intuitively feel this--when you finish watching television, you usually feel even more tired. When you finish watching a film, you often feel at least mentally energized--wanting to think and/or talk about it. (There are several different explanations for the difference, including the technology of non-digital film projection vs. television, the environment, the mindfullness, etc.]
I won't repeat everything I said in my earlier post Kill the TV, Keep the Shows, but a few of the quotes from the Scientific American Mind piece on television addiction include:
"Most of the criteria of substance dependence can apply to people who watch a lot of TV."
"...University of British Columbia studied a mountain community that had no television until cable finally arrived. Over time, both adults and children in the town became less creative in problem solving, less able to persevere at tasks, and less tolerant of unstructured time."
"To some researchers, the most convincing parallel between TV and addictive drugs is that people experience withdrawal symptoms when they cut back on viewing."
"Even researchers who study TV for a living marvel at the medium's hold on them personally. Percy Tannenbaum of the University of California at Berkeley has written: 'Among life's more embarrassing moments have been countless occasions when I am engaged in conversation in a room while a TV set is on, and I cannot for the life of me stop from periodically glancing over to the screen.'"
At the Conference on World Affairs, Dr. Thomas Lewis, who I referenced in the Why face to face still matters post, talked at length about how drops in social and community involvement track closely with the arrival of cable to an area with no TV reception (most heavily documented in the Canadian studies mentioned earlier). He mentioned scenarios where a community loses power for several days in a row, cutting off their nightly TV ritual, and they suddenly get to know their neighbors for the first time. (Other factors are at work there as well, but it's not that hard to imagine that the lack of TV played a role.)
Throwing out my television has made a greater difference in my life than anything else I've ever done. But again, I recognize that there are some people who have the discipline to watch only very specific programs, using time-shifting to skip ads and news promos, as opposed to saying, "Let's see what's on TV..." For me, I found television to be too much of an event horizon; the only way for me to break free was to get rid of it completely. Of course, getting rid of TV just means I have more time to obsessively check my email.
So, is there anyone here who isn't already diligent with their Tivo, who is willing to disable the TV tuner (unplug cable/antennas, etc.) for a week and watch DVDs or shows on the computer? (Under the assumption that for most, viewing habits change dramatically when you shift from having television available 24-7 vs. watching specific shows--as mindful choices--on a computer.)
Note: If you have kids who might really struggle with this, there are more resources on how to do this at tvturnoff.org.
Be sure to stock up on Sudokus. Although... I think those evil little number puzzles are far more addicting than TV. That said, they're better for your brain and don't do that whole "orienting response" described in the article I referenced:
"The effects of the orienting response include dilation of the blood vessels to the brain, slowing of the heart, constricting of the blood vessels to major muscle groups, blockage of alpha waves to the brain for a few seconds, etc."
[Bonus link: Communicatrix writes a poem about TV Turn Off Week]
[Picture and video are from Adbusters.org]
Posted by Kathy on April 24, 2006 | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/220252/4735625
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference It's TV Turn Off Week--can you do it?:
» TV Free from The Alpha Mind
Kathy Sierra (whose blog I must really like—Im tempted to comment on it every day) reminds us of TV Turn Off Week.
Im so glad its easy. Ive been virtually TV-free for ten years. (Virtually means I watch other... [Read More]
Tracked on Apr 24, 2006 4:33:23 PM
» Faça um bem ao seu cérebro - Semana mundial da TV desligada from [ Últimas Palavras ]
Pois é galera, vi hoje no blog da Kathy Sierra que estamos na semana mundial da campanha Desligue a sua televisão!
Pra mim, pelo menos, não vai ter muita dificuldade, já faz um bom tempo que eu larguei a caixinha de emoções... [Read More]
Tracked on Apr 24, 2006 8:15:58 PM
» TV abstinence from The Bell Curve Scar
Kathy Sierra talks about TV Turn Off Week in this post.
Not a problem for me. I find so little of value coming from the networks these days. I will confess a mild craving for Lost, but I dont need a TV for that now.
... [Read More]
Tracked on Apr 25, 2006 6:27:18 AM
» Turn off the Boob tube from The Scientific Indian
TV Turnoff WeekGo on. Ramya and myself have been TV-less for almost four months now. The experience has been nothing short of liberating. Of course, I am not recommending that you to go completely non-visual. If you have broadband internet connection you [Read More]
Tracked on Apr 25, 2006 7:12:26 AM
» TV Turn Off Week from Moving innovations
Well, last week it was, anyway. And at the time I did read the article on the generally wonderful creating passionate users blog. While I tend to agree with the general sentiment, it has always been hard to actually act on it, even though that is the only [Read More]
Tracked on May 1, 2006 1:03:12 PM
Comments
Kathy,
I've been TV free for a full year now, and only get occasional glimpses of it when I'm at a friends house or at a bar. The commercials actually make me mentally queasy now that I'm not longer desensitized to them. It's particularly jarring for me when I can't hold a conversation with someone in a restaurant because they keep glancing at a nearby TV.
As for Sudokus, they've become my morning "brain stretching" in the morning before I get down to work. Taking 10-30 mins to solve one of the little buggers has proven to be a great way to wake up my brain at 7am and I get into the zone easier for programming.
Posted by: Larry Myers | Apr 24, 2006 4:04:00 PM
Me and my wife, we got a TV as a marriage present. We got rid of it 6 months later. Now it's 4 years and we never regreted. We go to cinema, we watch movies on a laptop like twice a month and it's just enough :)
What I don't understand, everytime I tell somebody we don't have a TV, they either think we're so poor or so crazy. And noone ever believed me life is better without TV...
Posted by: bobes | Apr 24, 2006 4:10:57 PM
Great post.
I recently decided to completely give up television. Although I did not watch a lot of television before, giving it up completely prevents that inevitable "Lets see whats on..." to pop up into your head.
With dvd's and the internet, avoiding television completely probably won't have a huge impact anyways.
Posted by: Scott Young | Apr 24, 2006 4:15:06 PM
I have a TV but only use it to watch DVDs.
Posted by: EFL Geek | Apr 24, 2006 4:17:04 PM
Another very good resource for how television affects the brain and learning is Joseph Pearce's Evolution's End. Very interesting information about how the medium affects how you're stimulated and the related content of the shows.
Posted by: tim kelly | Apr 24, 2006 4:18:20 PM
Whose idea was it to schedule "TV Turn Off Week" when there are only six hours left to go in 24?
Sorry, maybe next year ;)
Posted by: Bill Mietelski | Apr 24, 2006 4:40:22 PM
We have a TV but we rarely watch it. We made a conscious choice not to have it in our primary living room, but instead put it downstairs. We use it almost solely for watching DVDs.
The hard part though is being a GB Packer fan; for me the TV is generally only on during the NFL Season, even then I feel guilty and often try to do something else productive while the Packer game is on.
Posted by: Jim | Apr 24, 2006 4:59:57 PM
Just under two years and (not really) counting. I don't even miss missing it.
Every once in a while (every couple months) I get the urge to watch/rent a movie. But that's what the Mac's 23" LCD is for :)
Posted by: Mad William Flint | Apr 24, 2006 5:21:20 PM
Kathy,
I too have been TV and commercial radio-liberated for 2yrs now and it's just plain better way of life. Sometimes you feel out of the loop when people are discussing their favorite characters from the OC or Biggest Loser, Survivor, or whatever the latest reality crapshow is. But those aren't the people I want to associate with anyways- Books, DVDs and coffee shops are where it's at. Actually del.icio.us and digg are my equivalents of veging out and "channel surfing." You are spot on with this post as always. I also recommend tuning out FM radio and replacing it with satellite (i use Sirius) and podcasts via the iTalk on your iPod. I wrote a prescription for how to handle the daily "mental fragmentation" that occurs from being blitzed with so many clips and soundbytes here->
http://www.scrollinondubs.com/index.cfm/2006/4/1/Is-hyperconnectedness-making-us-all-ADD-Make-your-depth-2000ft
Sean
Posted by: Sean Tierney | Apr 24, 2006 5:28:01 PM
There are definitely different levels of "TV watching." I watch an average of one hour a day (The Daily Show, Colbert Report, South Park, and Drawn Together) plus the occasional stand-up special. My parents probably watches as many hours of TV shows as I, but they don't even have cable, they get DVDs through Netflix. So who watches more TV?
I write this while staring at well over 50 RSS feeds and a dozen Firefox tabs. TV may be worse for the brain, but at least it's possible to not have anything to watch.
Posted by: Adam Bloom | Apr 24, 2006 6:04:49 PM
I didn't need to make an effort to quit watching television. It started to bore me. The news is always at least several hours behind the Internet, and the gossip/rumors are even further behind, lol.
I do think it works fairly well for comedy, and occasionally there's a documentary that's worth catching (although its stunning how little information is conveyed via the typical television documentary, compared to what you can learn by spending a half hour with a book).
Posted by: Kirsten | Apr 24, 2006 7:08:02 PM
What's a television?
Oh yeah, that box that used to live under my stereo...
:-)
Posted by: Cyndi L | Apr 24, 2006 7:22:37 PM
Kathy this is SO true, I've *only* watched movies and TV shows for the past 4-5 years on the computer and the experience is 100% different, actually my monitor is bigger than my TV! (TV is a *very* old 14", monitor is a pretty 21" flat CRT, and a secondary 19" old moni where i can track the progress of important mails or anything I'm waiting for)
Watching "TV" (that is, watching "cable") is a passive activity, you change the channels to see if you find anything worth watching, usually w/o luck, AND you waste 18 minutes per hour watching commercials. 99% of them totally non-intersting for you (worse than google ads)
Instead, if you say "I want to see X tonight", its proactive, you see it when you want it, how you want it, no commercials.
Also, when I first stopped watching "cable", I watched a lot of movies, and I mean a LOT of them. And I learned a lot, I got to see the classics etc. Its really simple:
Around 18 mins per hour while watching TV shows on prime time are commercials, the length of a normal movie is 90 minutes aprox, so if you watch 5 hours a day of "TV", you're thowing away the chance to see the classics (Hitchcock etc), european movies (those that ironically never are on TV), or just doing something more productive.
To the point: even if you're a movie gore or a TV addict (you follow 15 tv shows from 6 different TV Networks), don't do it on the cable!, watch it on the computer, you'll get to see stuff of your choice and better.
Posted by: Edgardo | Apr 24, 2006 7:50:30 PM
Thanks for this, Kathy! This week I had already decided to cut down on my kids' screen time and I feel even more motivated now. I told my ten-year-old "hey, it's TV turnoff week" and he said "that sounds like fun! Do you want to play Scrabble?"
We had only a 13" tv when we lived in California and had just one kid... we rarely, if ever, watched anything. Now we watch almost every night. Whatever's on. Pretty enervating. Maybe we'll ditch our TVs.
Posted by: Anne Z. | Apr 24, 2006 7:57:05 PM
I've been TV free for about just over six years now. My son is 9 and he's been able to watch parent selected videos or DVDs - so I've been spared the begging for every toy advertised on television.
I feel like I THINK so much more now - I actually think of television watching as a waste of my time. I'd rather research ideas and information on the internet and then read books or journals to dig deeper into the subject matter.
I find televison shows, commercials and newscasts so friggin' irriating. All gloss and no no substance - just flash and soundbites to catch your attention and create stress and worry. There's never an exploration of the deeper reasons behind anything.
TV?? *shudder*
I'm MUCH happier and a much better person without it.
Posted by: Karen | Apr 24, 2006 10:16:30 PM
Right on!
I have been without ownership of a TV for 3 years now. Reason being, I moved to Japan. Hard to pack a TV in your luggage. After I arrived, my work schedule was such that every 6 months I would be living in a different city, so I figured it would be best to minimize any luggage I would have... So no TV.
Well I got used to it. Really used to it.
I think if Japanese TV wasn't in Japanese, it would be of nearly no value to me to watch. Days feel longer. I have more energy. I only watch what I want to watch when I want to watch it by renting movies...
Will never look back!
Posted by: Harvey | Apr 24, 2006 10:46:15 PM
I've been off TV for over a month now since I moved to the new place wihtout a TV, and I haven't had the desire to get one. And I must say I couldn't feel better now, I rest better, eat better, think clearer, gain control back of my own life and, most of all, pick up on reading again! I say, it's TV turn-off year! Really, who needs a TV if all it offers is nothing but negative and entertainment news, scandals, shameful political bigotry, and all sum up in one word: noise.
Posted by: Lo Vui Keng | Apr 24, 2006 11:24:33 PM
I've been pretty much TV-free for 5 years, and I love it. Along with becoming vegetarian, one of the best things I ever did!
Posted by: Michael G. Richard | Apr 24, 2006 11:29:18 PM
Can I get "Creating Passionate Users" on DVD? ;-) It's so amazing how each of your posts makes me smile and think.
Robi
Posted by: robi | Apr 24, 2006 11:53:53 PM
I run two board game blogs, write articles for board game journals, and host a weekly board gaming group. Whatever am I going to do with my time?
I've had no TV for more than ten years now, although I sometimes watch TV episodes on the computer or rent a DVD. And I have kids, too.
Yehuda
Posted by: Yehuda Berlinger | Apr 25, 2006 1:12:11 AM
After moving out from my parents house I never owned a TV, and in this 18 years I never missed it.
Posted by: Sam | Apr 25, 2006 1:46:28 AM
TV really is like crack. There's so much good stuff on Sky at the moment, I really have to wrench myself away from it for other stuff. It's mainly the 8-11pm part of the evening, when they have excellent series like "Thief" which has just taken over from "Over There" following the latter's season finale a fortnight ago. I love these series, but they're such a thief of time. I'm torn between upgrading to a new high-def TV and jacking TV in altogether. The worst thing is though, without it, I think my 3 year old would drive my wife mad. This morning, he woke up at 6 after my 7.5 month old daughter who has a cold had kept my wife up most of the night. She was so exhausted, but he was insistent on getting up, so I, on my way out to work, got him his breakfast & sat him in front of the TV downstairs. If he'd been left, he'd have woke up Melissa & that would have been it for my wife for the morning. How do you train a 3 year old boy to sit quietly & play alone or read his picture books?
Posted by: Matt Moran | Apr 25, 2006 4:03:51 AM
I wonder what the results would be of the study you cite if computers and the internet were introduced into the community instead of cable TV. ;)
Computers can be just as mindless, junk filled, robbers of time, that isolate members of a family. One technology is not inherently better than the other. Sometimes we just replace one addiction with another. It all depends on how you use it. I try to limit myself on both, and spend more face-to-face time with the people in my life.
What we really need is technology turn off week. Can you do that? ;)
Posted by: Mary-Anne | Apr 25, 2006 7:09:22 AM
The other benefit is losing weight! (No, this is not some post about getting out and doing some exercise, although that is of course a good thing). There was a study recently in Oz that concluded that you burn more calories staring at a TV that is turned off, than staring at one that is turned on - apparently related to the hypnotic effect you referred to - everything slows down.
Posted by: Connor McDonald | Apr 25, 2006 7:25:49 AM
What a great post! Because I don't watch TV, I have noticed that I am a bit of a social outcast at work. It seems that the only thing that gets people talking to each other is American Idol. I try to talk to them about the latest exciting technologies and how they're affecting society and culture, world news, etc, and I get no response, but they light up when Lost comes up.
I don't want to sound judgemental, but it is sad to see how the TV-watching that people do in their private time creates a social rift, and makes it very difficult to make meaningful social connections with one another.
Posted by: Sally Carson | Apr 25, 2006 7:29:47 AM
I don't know if i can do it. I am not addicted to TV perse but I am addicted to knowledge and learning. There is just so many good programs on throughout the week. I think there should be a difference between mindless tv and then the tv watchers who get something out of the learning network or techTV or health network. Trends set the pace for alot of design and user experiences. And expanding my mind to new worlds(travel network) sometimes is all the inspiration i need to pick up the mouse again and create something really cool!
Posted by: Bernie Aho | Apr 25, 2006 8:37:10 AM
I don't watch TV from 6 years maybe.
Posted by: Abdelrahman Osama | Apr 25, 2006 9:46:36 AM
My TV is off, but only while the Stanley Cup Playoffs aren't on. :) We do play street hockey between periods, however!
Posted by: Mike R | Apr 25, 2006 9:53:28 AM
Dear Kathy, I have forwarded a link to this page to everyone in my extended family (hi, gang!) some of whom watch TV and some do not. I think your point about TV watching being essentially passive and hypnotic is quite telling. Since my teenager started watching television (he got started on the TV habit at extracurricular 'TV clubs' at the should-know-better school he attends) his curiosity and joie de vivre seem a lot lower than before. (We always told him growing up that people watch a lot of TV 'because they don't know any better', which I think is not untrue, right?).
For my own part, I've found not watching TV frees up a HUGE amount of time, not just for reading, but for writing, and writing has become a lot easier, too.
Here's a question for you. We think -- and speak -- of the presentation of information to us through 'media'. There's a lot of talk about media. Don't you think this is a mistake? By thinking that what we are getting is a mediated experience of something else, and in talking about it that way, aren't we obscuring the fact that what we think is a _mediated_ experience is actually its very own, albeit inferior, mode of life? (p.s. this is not a rhetorical question. I'm looking for an answer, right here on the bitstream).
Thoughtfully yours...
Posted by: George Girton | Apr 25, 2006 11:02:34 AM
I enjoy your site a lot and find it really useful. Except for the bits where you preach about the evils of television, which I find judgmental, bordering on arrogant. Can't wait for you to get back to the good stuff!
Posted by: Jason | Apr 25, 2006 11:40:31 AM
In the UK, at least, dear old (ad-free) Aunty Beeb still keeps up the quality enough to justify the odd documentary each week (David Attenborough's latest was worth the license fee alone, IMHO), though when they switch off the analogue transmissions and go digital it may be time to jack it in altogether. Definitely wouldn't bother if I lived stateside, 18m of ads every hour, yuck! Dave Pollard quoted someone cynically likening consumers to "gullets", which seems not unappropriate. The Beeb also published this little gem at the start of the year: not sure about the precision of the figures, but for those of us who haven't made the break yet - last one out, please switch off the lights (and the telly :)
http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/mpapps/pagetools/print/news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4620350.stm
Posted by: ken | Apr 25, 2006 2:12:54 PM
I didn't go through and read all the other comments, so, someone may have already said/asked this. I would LOVE to get rid of our TV. However, the other person making up "our" is my husband and there is no way he is giving up watching sports (I also have grown to love watching sports so I can't pin it all on him). It wouldn't be so bad if we only used our TV to watch sports, but because it is there and because we struggle with self-control in this area, we use it for more than just sports. Do you have any good solutions to this problem? We have tried the going out to a restaraunt or bar when a game is on, but this gets expensive. I would really appreciate it if someone had a solution where we could get rid of the TV and still somehow watch sports.
Posted by: Mollie | Apr 25, 2006 2:55:00 PM
I like television.
I like to knit or crochet (less often: read, or program) while I watch, but I don't necessarily think that the multitasking aspect is required in order to somehow defend my choice. I just like it.
I've lived without a television for stretches of up to six months at a time and that was fine too, but on the whole I like having the option.
It's part of today's culture mosaic, a point of commonality with other people. Like the theatre, or music, or the news, or movies, or my garden, or any of the other things that I like. Somehow, though, I never find myself feeling guiltily lowbrow when I admit to gardening. Or feeling defensive (like now :). Hrmph.
Posted by: Amy | Apr 25, 2006 4:18:43 PM
My husband and I got rid of our TV (ok, we put it in storage for the first year) about five years ago. Being TV addicts, we had a hard time adjusting at first. My husband paced up and down the hall (short hall, we lived in San Francisco) for the first month and I read a lot.
I quickly noticed that people loved to talk about last night's episode of whateverwaspopularatthetime. I found myself unable to contribute to the conversation so I would boldly announce that we did NOT have a TV. Silence, faces dropping and gasping sounds were the typical reaction. They couldn't believe what came out of my mouth--as if I had insulted their mother or something. Then they would ask me what we did without a TV.
I still get the same reaction but now people feel free to tell me that I’m crazy! What a hoot!
One more funny comment on TV…When we put our condo up for sale our realtor said that prospective buyers would ask her where our TV was!
Posted by: Stacy Dieter | Apr 25, 2006 5:11:23 PM
It's effectively been TV turn-off year for me. I watch the Daily Show now and then, but that's it.
Posted by: Bob Aman | Apr 26, 2006 6:48:15 AM
I will turn off my tv when I burn books and stop using the computer.
No one can say that TV is a different medium than film, the web or books. Watching a good, well-written, thoughtful TV show, as diverse as the original twilight zone to Charlie Rose to NOVA to a 1969 episode of Sesame Street to youtube viral videos will educate and inspire. No one has ever proved otherwise.
Remember that in the 1950s, the crusade was against smutty books, comic books, and the like. Reading, the moral majority said, was bad. Now the conservatives are anti-TV.
Anyone without a television is depriving themselves of something wonderful and positive in their lives. There is as little to be proud of by not owning a TV as there is by not owning a computer- I have neighbors who are VERY VERY proud they don't own computers. I have neighbors who are VERY proud they don't own cars. I have neighbors who are proud they don't own pets. I have neighbors who are proud they don't have kids. I am proud that I don't read junk novels on the bestseller list, even though it means I don't know what the DaVinci Code means.
No, if you don't have a TV and if you don't watch positive, important TV shows, then you're missing out on life.
Don
Posted by: Don | Apr 26, 2006 7:55:28 AM
I actually had a ceremony when I turned off my television. Back in September 2001, a couple of days after the World Trade Center came down, James DePreist and the Oregon Symphony had a memorial concert for the victims, simulcast on KOPB-TV and KBPS-FM. I decided there wasn't anything television could ever add to that, turned it off, and it's still off.
Posted by: Ed Borasky | Apr 26, 2006 8:29:37 AM
I don't watch TV. Not as a conscious effort, but because I literally have no desire to. Maybe I just spend too much time geeking out in front of the computer but I only really have any interest in 24 and Lost. So I guess I'm quite lucky -- I can quit telly without having to try ;)
Posted by: Jon Leighton | Apr 26, 2006 1:15:36 PM
Easy. Too Easy. Only because I've got to catch up on the first 4 seasons of 24, which happen to be on my computer.
Besides, I watch very little T.V. - only recently have I begun to watch 24, Prison Break, Apprentice & The Office.
No computer would be impossible for me though.
Posted by: Anonymous | Apr 26, 2006 1:43:46 PM
It has been 2 years I haven't watch TV except watching cartoons or music albums that too very rarely.
Through at times I want to watch some good programs on Discovery or on CNBC.
But I found in most of the cases computer/internet is the main cause for quitting TV.
Posted by: Paavani | Apr 26, 2006 2:01:16 PM
Funny--it's been almost three days since I watched TV and I miss it.
And I don't.
I think I'll keep TV in the mix when this is all over, but I'm not sure what the mix will be. I like being able to tune into what's going on. I also like a lot (not all) of the shows I get to see.
I think a Myth TV box (the BF keeps promising to build me one) or TIVO is in order, though. This is horrible coming from someone who still makes a large chunk of her annual income from acting in them, but the commercials are SO ANNOYING!!!
Posted by: communicatrix | Apr 26, 2006 7:54:08 PM
I don't watch much TV because I can't find much that's interesting enough to sit there and watch. The only shows I watch (actually, I tape them) now are Desperate Housewives (a totally guilty pleasure) and Saturday Night Live (still funny after all these years), and I get movies from Netflix. Sometimes I fast forward through the ads, but frankly, sometimes the ads are quite good filmmaking, better than the TV shows; the new VW "Safe Happens" ad is one of them.
Posted by: Claire | Apr 27, 2006 12:37:03 PM
No problem here. We are TV-free and proud of it since 1. December 2000. Just a little bit behind you. ;-)
Posted by: Ralph F | Apr 28, 2006 11:41:29 AM
'Invert selection' for me on this: While being virtually TurnedOff the rest of the year, ironically this week for me steadily results in TurnOn Week as the World Championship snooker is on.
Posted by: DoubleG | Apr 28, 2006 6:11:12 PM
We haven't watched TV since 1990 - not once, not a single show. It wasn't a conscious choice at first - we were just too busy working full time, going to college and raising a son. 16 years have gone by since then. We DID try to watch something after that first semester ended, just to wind down, but we were insulted at the stupidity and haven't turned it on since. My stomach would be sick if I spent my precious time like that. It's like quitting smoking - you can't believe you EVER put that crap in your lungs!
Now that I've gone without TV for 16 years (and it hasn't been hard at all!), I have lots of probably obnoxious prejudices against it and people who spend a lot of time watching it.
I think TV allows a lot of really unhappy people to hide from their unhappiness. I think people confuse the activity on the TV with activity in their OWN lives. I think it's a narcotic for people who don't want to sit still and just be with themselves.
I am happy with the amount we've accomplished in 16 years, all without seeing Seinfeld, Oprah, Sex in the City, Friends, reality TV, American Idol...I still know about these shows - they're in the OTHER media I pay attention to - National Public Radio, Wall Street Journal, etc. We have more time in our day than anyone else we know, because we're not watching TV.
When I tell people how long it's been since we've watched TV, they instantly assume we're uninformed. They soon find out we know quite a bit about what's going on - most of the time more than they do.
I have noticed how sensitized I've become, though, to violence, loud noise, ridiculously stupid marketing, and herd behavior. It drives me crazy when others aren't even bothered or don't even notice.
I hear only 2% of people never, ever watch TV. People are always wishing for more hours in the day. Here's the way to get them. Turn off the
Posted by: CJ | Apr 28, 2006 6:28:14 PM
Tube. :)
Posted by: CJ | Apr 28, 2006 6:30:01 PM
I have never owned a TV. After I moved out of my parents house, I couldn't afford one. Now that I can afford one or two or three, I really feel sorry for people who are addicted to it. To own one is to need one. Most people I know own more than one. It's absolutely pathetic. Incredibly sad.
What do I do with my time? My children and I go for walks together. We read books. Sometimes we go to museums or to the usual parent/kid stuff -- soccer practice and game, basketball practice and games, piano lessons, etc. We went bowling together last night. It was great.
There isn't enough time to do everything we want to do. I can't imagine having to hook up for my dose of violence, negativity, and brainwashing.
My kids don't miss the idiot box either. They get plenty at their grandma's house. But they never pine for it at home.
Posted by: Yo | Apr 29, 2006 9:49:58 PM
A relevant The Onion article:
http://www.theonion.com/content/node/28694
Posted by: n | May 1, 2006 12:19:00 PM
n: Hah! I think that describes a few people here. Oh wait, that described ME! ; )
Don: "No one can say that TV is a different medium than film, the web or books. "
That's not entirely true. From a time perspective, perhaps. But from a physiological reference, television is very different, and has the different effects on the brain (including the "orienting response") than most other things. Film is different for a variety of reasons, although it is still a moving picture -- but the way real film appears to your eye/brain (as opposed to tv), does not have the same lowered-metabolism effect.
Also, I agree with you about the shows -- but thankfully, we no longer need television in order to enjoy some of the best shows. I count on The Daily Show when I need a break, and I get yesterday's show from iTunes.
Bill M: "Whose idea was it to schedule "TV Turn Off Week" when there are only six hours left to go in 24? Sorry, maybe next year ;)"
Oh, I'm SO crying for you... some of us have to wait another 9 frickin' months before we get to find out what happens on 24! ; )
Posted by: Kathy Sierra | May 1, 2006 2:33:44 PM
It's funny how TV becomes a monolithic thing in our minds. TV is this, TV is that. TV is much to broad and varied of a medium to be dismissed totally in an effort to look cool in front of our online friends, or to be embraced into every part of our lives. Saying I'm better off without TV is kind of like saying I'm better off without books. The natural question is "what kind of books/programs are you better off without?"
Posted by: Jon Strocel | May 3, 2006 1:31:22 AM
You might enjoy this OLD (1995) video that mixes images from the then-popular media culture into anti-television techno.
http://www.webratsmusic.com/video-3332-electronic-behavior-control-system.php
Posted by: John Smart | May 4, 2006 9:59:10 AM
Folks, I think a lot of you are missing the point. Substituting the computer for the TV as a means of video entertainment, whether it be for movies, podcasts, myspace or what have you, is just trading one form of digital disconnect for another.
Granted, there are arguments in favor of choosing one's programming rather than having it passively spoon fed to you, but don't you think that this is rather like the cigarette addict that cuts down from a pack a day to just a few "well chosen" cigarettes? All one is doing is managing one's addiction; one is still an addict. And this is opperating under the assumption that the internet is somehow less addictive or less daming than television which I think we all know is untrue.
Digital media has such an incredibly pervasive hold on us that few of us even rocognize it.
I found this article from MSNBC particularly disturbing, I'm reprinting it here in it's entirety:
---------------------------------------------------
Study: Public abandons nature for 'videophilia'
PHILADELPHIA - Americans are less interested in spending time in natural surroundings like national parks because they are spending more time watching television, playing video games and surfing the Internet, according to a study released Tuesday.
The study, for The Nature Conservancy, found per-capita visits to national parks have been declining for years.
National park visitation data starting in 1930 peaked in 1987 at 1.2 visits per person per year. But by 2003 it had declined by about 25 percent to 0.9 visits per person per year, said Oliver Pergams, an ecologist at the University of Illinois who analyzed the data for the study.
The data, based on government statistics and other sources, were taken as a proxy for interest in nature in general.
Researchers tested more than two dozen possible explanations for the trend and found that 98 percent of the drop in national park visits was explained by video games, movie rentals, going out to movies, Internet use and rising fuel prices.
Other possible explanations such as family income or the aging population were ruled out.
There was a sufficiently high correlation between declining national park visits and the burgeoning use of electronic media that led Pergams and his associate, Patricia Zaradic, believe the two are linked. “It made us feel fairly certain that there is an association,” Pergams told Reuters.
The study, to be published in the Journal of Environmental Management, concludes that the trend has negative implications for environmental stewardship.
“We may be seeing evidence of a fundamental shift away from people’s appreciation of nature to 'videophilia’ which we here define as the new human tendency to focus on sedentary activities involving electronic media,” the researchers said.
“Such a shift would not bode well for the future of biodiversity conservation.”
Nature Conservancy President Steve McCormick said the study suggests Americans and their children in particular are losing their connection to the natural world.
“When children choose TVs over trees, they lose touch with the physical world outside and the fundamental connection of those places to our daily lives,” McCormick said.
--------------------------------------------------------
Let's shut the damn things off and go outside for a change. Leave the laptop at home, walk right on past the wifi cafe, find the nearest green spot and reflect on what's important, for ourselves, for our children and our children's children.
Posted by: Adam Cerutti | Jun 22, 2006 1:48:01 PM
TV=Entertainment...If you feel better about yourself for not watching tv, you got some issues.
But I agree that it can't be too good for you when/if you're addicted to it like that.
Most people read a tv guide or check tv listings somewhere to see if theres anything worth watching on tv. I wouldn't say thats an addiction. Merely a desire to learn/be entertained.
Posted by: End Ran | Jun 30, 2006 10:44:58 PM
i have been tv free for 7 years now and have not one regret. life is peaceful, i have excorsized the demons that used to scream loudly into my living room:
"BUY THIS, BUY THAT.." HEY!! HEY!! LOOK AT US!! BLAH BLAH BLAH
"HEY! DO YOU NEED A LAWYER? A CAREER? A MATRESS? DO YOU NEED HUGGIES?, FEMININE NAPKINS? HOW ABOUT A PSYCHIC??
STAY TUNED AND WE WILL BOMBARD YOU WITH LOTS OF COMMERCIALS AIMED AT THE JOBLESS, THE UNEMPLOYED HOUSEWIFE, THE CAR ACCIDENT VICTIM, THE STARVING CHILDREN, THE ELDERLY, THE INJURED AND THE RETARDED.
WE WILL ALSO BOMBARD YOU WITH A STEAMING PILE OF FESTERING, PUTRID DOG POOP CALLED JERRY SPRINGER.
i once read somewhere that unplugging the tv is like ridding yourself of several, loud, obnoxious, crass, vulgar people from your living room.
no stinky trash(AKA tv) in MY house.
Posted by: sam | Aug 5, 2006 4:13:55 PM
Who really cares?
Everyone is different, therefore everyone has different needs.
I can't stand it when people take the moral high ground because of a choice they have made, as if this somehow makes them better than everyone else.
There are so many things in life that are "bad" for us, caffeine, TV, alcohol, what will it be tomorrow? We're all going to die anyway, TV or not, if it makes a few people happy in the meantime, why should they deprive themselves of it? How far does the average person have to go to be completely guilt free?
Personally, I think time spent online is a far greater waste of time as there are NO limits. One hyperlink to another, one thought to another, one search to another. Ditch the computers, that's what I say.
Posted by: Laura Jane | Aug 15, 2006 4:38:41 AM
I think I could turn my television off for a week although it would be super hard as I write a television blog!!! I think even harder would be to turn my PC off for a week, i feel pretty disconnected from the world without it (sad but true).
Posted by: Television Blog | Apr 16, 2007 6:00:24 PM
I don't think that making radical changes are the answer.
Life is better through moderation and being a connoisseur. It would be better to give up an hour a day of your least favorite TV shows.
Let it then unfold as a natural process: as you find more fulfilling things to do, you might give up more TV, until you reach a point that you are down to the "cream" of TV that you enjoy.
How many hours a week, or what shows, are an individual judgment.
Posted by: Praveen | Apr 17, 2007 12:56:12 PM



